Khamis, Mac 29, 2012

EXCESSIVE SHIPPING COSTS IS THE ISSUE – FSM

Excessive shipping costs is the issue – FSM

Quote:’Right now, the shipping industries win all and Sabah loses all.’

KOTA KINABALU Mac 29, 2012: Transport Minister Datuk Transport Minister Dato Seri Kong Cho Ha still does not understand the predicament of Sabah industry, especially with regard to the import and export of goods, said the Federation of Sabah Manufacturers (FSM).

Based on the minister’s statements and clarifications, it is obvious that he still does not understand, FSM said in a statement yesterday.

It said: “We have made it very clear that it is not a question of direct shipment entering or leaving Sabah. “The gist of the issue, which the Transport Minister missed is the excessive shipping costs of doing business in Sabah.

“Some examples of these costs are the terminal handling charge, local container handling charge, the bunker adjustment factor charges and other ancillary charges etc.

“The Transport Minister should really study and educate himself on the shipping costs borne by Sabah shippers (shippers refer to people who are using ships that is the importers and exporters) and to understand it from Sabah’s perspective.

“These costs are exorbitant and are being hiked constantly and arbitrarily; there is no monitoring body to regulate price within the shipping industry and there is no fair competition within the shipping industry in order to bring about fair prices due to the restrictive cabotage policy.”

According to FSM, Sabah shippers are heavily burdened by these costs and are at the mercy of the shipping companies.

“This is totally unfair and unacceptable to Sabah and cannot be allowed to continue.

“Does the minister know the shippers or the people of Sabah are paying more than a billion ringgit a year for these shipping services? In other words this is more than RM100 million business for them a month.

“The Transport Minister has claimed to have met and discussed the issue 22 times. After so many meetings, the issue remains unresolved.

“We know for a fact that the current Transport Minister has met with Sabah trade chambers and associations only once and nothing came out of that one and only meeting.

“We wonder which relevant authorities he met for 21 times when the right party to meet is the Sabah trade chambers and associations.

“It is frustrating that the Minister of Transport and his officers involved takes years to reach a decision (or no decision), nothing concrete is on the way.

It shows how incompetent they are and this is completely in contrast with the concept of 1Malaysia which advocates “People first and performance now” as initiated by our Prime Minister,” said the federation.

“Let’s not waste more valuable time and resources debating the same old issues which we already know like the back of our palms.

“Let’s move the agenda forward now to translate the current Transport Minister’s wish to achieve a win-win situation, especially for Sabah, as he himself has put it.

“Right now, the shipping industries win all and Sabah loses all.

“Since the minister has claimed that he knows what the people of Sabah want, we will wait and see whether his words match with his action,” FSM said.

Meanwhile, the federation thanked the state government, particularly Deputy Chief Minister Tan Sri Datuk Seri Panglima Joseph Pairin Kitingan, Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Dr Yee Moh Chai and Assistant Minister to the Chief Minister Datuk Edward Khoo as well as all concerned citizens from both sides of the political divide for lending support to this issue and hopes a concrete and long-term solution can be achieved soon with the support of the State Government.

However, FSM stands by what it had stressed earlier.

“We want the Prime Minister to step in. He may appoint a new MCA minister from Sabah to handle the case or a committee to be chaired by the former Minister of Transport Datuk Ong Tee Kiat who is also from MCA.”

Responding to Sabah Industrial Development Minister Datuk Raymond Tan’s statement that there is no more cabotage in Sepanggar port, FSM said:

“We hope the minister know what he is talking about? We wonder who has declared KK Port free from cabotage? “There is such thing as full liberalization and partial liberalization of the cabotage policy. “Sepanggar or KK port was given only partial liberalization on June 3, 2009.

There is no cabotage among the ports within Peninsular Malaysia, that is what we call full liberalization.

“We want to tell the minister we did not start the war of words in the newspapers so is this message today.

“It was the Transport Minister who dropped a bombshell on the soil of Sabah’s newspapers on March 21. Maybe our minister can swallow the humiliation and insult.

“Sorry, we FSM in Sabah have our own dignity. We are not brave people but certainly we have the courage to correct what is wrong! We have sat down with them for more than 10 years and for the last 10 years we had, for every Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI) dialogue, submitted the same issue.

“We now have missed the tunnel, don’t even talk about the very dim light at the end of it.

“We do not blame MITI because they also have problem with Ministry of Transport. “If you are in our shoes you will understand our frustration.

“FSM’s proposal for 25 years of tax holidays to help the industry catch up with our counterpart in Peninsular was deemed illogical by the minister at an instant reply.

“He has not even asked for our proposal and the rationale why we proposed it, he already gave a negative answer.

“That is very quick and fast decision. He should make a better Transort Minister.

“The minister should compare apple to apple when he talks about incentives. The shipping industry enjoyed unlimited years of full tax holidays until 2012 and still enjoys 70 per cent tax exemption.

“Moreover they are given a protected market which has a volume of more than a billion ringgit a year to be shared among less than 10 companies by the cabotage policy.

Compare to the incentives that are given to the Sabah industry, we look very much like a second class citizen in our own land. “Is this what one’s call logic and fairness? Your guess is as good as ours.

“Below is a simple and conservative calculation for you to understand the seriousness of the issue.

Figures from 2011 statistics showed shipping revenue earned from Sabah amounted to RM1.2 billion a year.

  • “This is equivalent to RM35 per person per month based on population of three million, or RM175 per family.
  • “This amount of money earned by shipping alone constitutes 25 per cent of average Sabah household income of RM692 (RM577 x 1.2). (1.22 person is working out of average family size of 5.88 – Sabah statistics)
  • In other words 25 per cent of the family income goes to shipping cost! How about other logistic costs which may also be under the jurisdiction of MOT?

“As they claimed shipping costs only contributed 40 per cent to the total logistic costs, one can easily envisage the cost of goods in Sabah to be as high as more than 30 to 40 per cent compared to Peninsular.

“That is perhaps why Sabah Government has a tough time fighting poverty.”

FSM said that as elected representative of its members, it has the obligation to look into their predicament.

“They are the local SMEs and not the big corporate investors from overseas who can bring billions, but we are here to stay forever.

“Our SMEs are suffering and suffocating, we cannot tell them “Let us give you cake and Santola coffee”. We beg for your pardon.”

31 ulasan:

  1. “Does the minister know the shippers or the people of Sabah are paying more than a billion ringgit a year for these shipping services? In other words this is more than RM100 million business for them a month."

    Kementerian tahu juga tu, dan rasanya dorang pun berusah juga cari jalan utk tanggani ha ni.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Pasti kerajaan juga sentiasa mencari jalan yang terbaik untuk selesaikan isu ni agar rakyat Sabah tidak terbeban dengan kos2 yang terlibat.

      Padam
    2. Semoga penyelesaian terbaik dapat dicapai untuk kebaikan semua orang yang terlibat.

      Padam
  2. Tak dinafikan setelah sekian lama berlalu, hal ini masih juga belum berjaya diatasi. Namun jika kita asyik menyalahkan pun tidak ada guna juga. Lain lah cerita kalau tunding jari then terus selesai:P hehe

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Lebih baik cari jalan penyelesaian dan sumbangkan idea untuk menyelesaikan masalah ini daripada asyik menyalahkan.

      Padam
  3. Kalau lah begini ceritanya, memang tidak hairanlah kenapa Sabahan masih juga ada yang miskin. huhu

    BalasPadam
  4. Senario ini harus diteliti dan lakukanlah sesuatu sebelum ia bertambah teruk. Paling tidak pun mungkin boleh bagi penjelasan bagi mengelakkan salah faham.

    BalasPadam
  5. Najib said that it is up to the FSM to amend the shipping cost and methods, he also denied that the Federal Government insist that the shipment needs to go through Port Klang.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Kerajaan harus campur tangan untuk mengkaji kos pengangkutan yang lebih berpatutan.

      Padam
  6. Hopefully the excessive shipping cost can be remedied so that it will not cause the cost of goods increase as this is a burden for Sabahans.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Semoga isu ini dapat dikaji semula untuk mencari penyelesaian supaya boleh mengurangkan beban rakyat dalam harga barangan.

      Padam
  7. The people in Sabah needed to bare for all the costs.

    BalasPadam
  8. Balasan
    1. Carbotage not relevant and should terminate it.

      Padam
    2. Diharap kerajaan review semula polisi tu.

      Padam
  9. Kabotaj memanfaatkan siapa sebenarnya? Bukannya kerajaan tidak tahu tentang ini.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Its benefit more to the shipping company.

      Padam
  10. Bukan mudah untuk menampung kos perbelanjaan yang tinggi di Sabah.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. kos ini perlu dikurangkan, sebaiknya pelru ada polisi yang tidak membebankan.

      Padam
    2. Segerakan pelaksanaan minimum wage di Sabah.

      Padam
  11. Rakyat Sabah tidak akan bising2 tentang isu ini jika ia tidak membebankan rakyat. Tapi apa yang berlaku adalah di sebaliknya. Menteri perlu peka dengan masalah harga barang yang tinggi di Sabah. Punca sebenar perlu dikenalpasti sekaligus cari jalan penyelesaian untuk dapatkan win-win situation.

    BalasPadam
  12. Just abolished the policy....

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Actually the problem is not from the Cabotage Policy, it is only one of the points where the shipping routes and fees are involved, that is the point which needs to be reviewed by the state and federal government. If this point can be fixed, I'm sure it will reduce the cost of shipment which indirectly cause the cost of goods to increase.

      Padam
  13. All burden still back to the people.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. That is why we need to review the shipping cost. The reason why the shipment is more expensive to Sabah and Sarawak is because any foreign ships who wants to dock at East Malaysia needs to go through Port Klang first even if they are closer to East Malaysia.

      Padam
  14. There are monopoly the shipping market, thats why we need to bare for higher cost of living.

    BalasPadam
  15. dalam hal ini, kena ambil keputusan yang baik dan pastikan ia tidak membebankan.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Kerajaan bertanggungjawab meringgankan beban rakyat.

      Padam
  16. Peningkatan kos di Sabah antara disebabkan oleh dasar kabotaj di Sabah. Maka mungkin dasar ini perlu dikaji semula.

    BalasPadam
  17. Cara jalan penyelesaian mengenai kenaikkan harga barang di Sabah. Mungkin kerajaan perlu mula mencari jalan membantu penduduk Sabah yang menanggung pelbagai kenaikan harga.

    BalasPadam
  18. kerajaan perlu mempercepatkan pelaksanaan KR1M di semua daerah di negeri ini.. hanya dengan cara ini barulah beban rakyat dapat dikurangkan..

    BalasPadam