Isnin, Januari 10, 2011

CABOTAGE POLICY KEEPING SABAHANS POOR

Cabotage policy keeping Sabahans poor

January 10, 2011 - Industry players have blamed the 30-year-old cabotage policy for Sabah's high cost of living.

KOTA KINABALU: The unresolved cabotage policy imposed on Sabah (and Sarawak) has been blamed for the high cost of living and soaring prices of good and services in the states.

“In Sabah, the cabotage policy is the reason for the difference between prices of goods and services here and in the peninsula.

“Whatever you buy for RM1 in Kuala Lumpur, you pay at least RM1.30 in Kota Kinabalu. The prices are higher in the rural areas,” said a transport company employee.

Imposed in 1980 by the federal government in a bid to integrate all Malaysian maritime laws under the Ministry of Transport, the policy, according to industry players, has “discriminated and disfranchised” Sabah for the past 30 years.

They said the cabotage policy, aided by the existing leadership, could “jeopardise” the future of the state.

Speaking to FMT recently, the Federation of Sabah Manufacturers (FSM) said the federal  government must abolish the cabotage policy if it hoped to achieve Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s aspiration to see “an exponential growth” in the national economy.

image FSM president Wong Khen Thau said past promises made by the ruling administration to “liberalise” the policy were never kept.

Under the existing policy, only Malaysian-flagged ships are allowed to transport locally-manufactured goods from the peninsula to Sabah.

“This means only a small segment, probably less than 200 containers a month, may be coming into the state.

“I do not think it is going to benefit us very much,” Wong said.

Still the fact that the federal government had made promises to “liberalise” the policy and has done little to keep them is a sore point with the industry here.

Unkept promises

According to Wong, the federal government had agreed in 2009 to liberalise the cabotage policy for containerised transshipment cargoes for sectors between Sepanggar, Bintulu, Kuching and Tanjung Pelepas and vice-versa.

The “selective liberalisation” would have allowed foreign vessels to carry these cargoes between the sectors without the need for a domestic shipping licence.

But the full-scale implementation of the liberalisation never took place.

“The government promised to liberalise the cabotage policy in 2009 but it never took off.

“Then transport minister Ong Tee Kiat had promised to come back to FSM for more dialogues but it never materialised. The 30-year-old cabotage policy has adversely affected Sabah,” he said.

Wong said that so far the “only partial liberalisation” was done on containerised transshipment cargoes arriving in Kota Kinabalu from foreign countries but via Port Klang.

“So far only partial liberalisation has been implemented. And this too only on foreign-registered container cargoes arriving in Kota Kinablau via Port Klang,” he added.

image Wong said that a “full liberalisation” of the cabotage policy would give importers and exporters in Sabah and Sarawak an opportunity to enjoy low fare due to competition in the shipping transport sector.

This in turn would translate into cheaper consumer goods, he said.

Currently, foreign vessels (foreign shipping companies) are not allowed to transport Malaysian goods produced in the peninsula to Sabah.

“Likewise, foreign vessels are not allowed to take goods produced in Sabah to Tanjung Pelepas or Port Klang because this so-called domestic trade was only for local/Malaysian-owned vessels.

“In other words, (partial) liberalisation of the policy only covers transshipment of goods which come from overseas and land in Port Klang, and not locally manufactured goods from the peninsula,” Wong said.

NKEAs relevant in Sabah

He said that FSM had in 2009 pointed out to the federal government that if such a cabotage policy continued, not many foreign vessels would want to come in to only take goods to Sabah or Sarawak, unless they are allowed to carry locally-manufactured goods from the peninsula to Sabah, and vice-versa.

“But there has been no response. We know the government’s intention is to take care of the Malaysian shipping industry and help ensure its survival, but it should not forget the industries and consumers in Sabah,” he said.

In August last year, Federation of Chinese Association Sabah president Sari Tan had also urged the federal government to abolish the cabotage policy, which he said was “affecting Sabah’s ability to grow”.

While supporting Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s aim to turn Malaysia into a high-income generating nation by 2020, he said this goal was only possible if liberalisation of policies was in place.

He said the National Key Economic Areas (NKEA) Laboratory has identified 12 NKEAs, under the 10th Malaysia Plan, and these include petroleum, gas, energy, palm oil, financial services, tourism, business services, electric and electronic, wholesale and retail, education, communication, agriculture and Greater Kuala Lumpur.

Of the 12 NKEAs, Sari said, nine were relevant to Sabah.

“Since 92% of the NKEAs will depend on the participation of the private sector, there is still a lot that needs to be done to facilitate private sector investment specifically for Sabah,” he said.

---

Soaring anger over rising prices

31 ulasan:

  1. Isu Cabotage ini memang dah lama menyusahkan orang Sabah kerana menyebabkan harga baranga lebih tinggi serta kurang menggalakkan syarikat asing melabur ataupun membuat bisness di Sabah.

    BalasPadam
  2. Cabotage policy is one of the reason why Sabahans are poor. The government should find ways to improve the policy or better yet come up with a new policy.

    BalasPadam
  3. Hopefully the government realize how serious is this matter towards Sabah. Please don't let the people down.

    BalasPadam
  4. mungkin pekara ini perlu dikaji untuk mencari langkah yang boleh memberikan hasil yang lebih positif.

    BalasPadam
  5. cabotage policy perlu dilihat semula kerana ia membebankan Sabah. harga barangan di Sabah lebih tinggi berbanding di Semenanjung dan ini memberi kesan kepada penduduk Sabah serta ia kurang menarik minat pelabur.

    BalasPadam
  6. harap langkah penyelesaian terbaik berhubung isu ini dapat dicari.

    BalasPadam
  7. cabotage policy plus the increased of fuel price actually increased the number of poor people in both of these state. how the government can solve the problem of poverty in Sabah if they unable to solve the above factor.

    BalasPadam
  8. cabotage policy is not new issues in this state, it has long been discussed. politicians and the public especially Sabahan has been previously suggested many kind of solutions but still no action on the government side to solve this problem.

    BalasPadam
  9. The main problem is, the SM want to make money by implementing this cabotage. You think they want to cut it down easily?

    BalasPadam
  10. I see many of NGO especially Datuk Wong, voicing up for these matter but yet no avail. They obviously want to make fun with Sabahans.

    BalasPadam
  11. I thought this matter has been resolved. Seems like the Federal government is not interested to deal with us.

    BalasPadam
  12. Jurang antara kita dan Semenanjung tidak akan terurus.

    BalasPadam
  13. Cabotage policy should be abolished!

    BalasPadam
  14. Kerana polisi kabotaj inilah yang menyebabkan harga lebih tinggi dari yang asal. Yang paling ketara sekali ialah kereta. Perbezaan harga kereta semenanjung dengan Sabah sarawak antara RM2000 keatas. Bayangkan??RM2000 boleh buat banyak perkara lagi.

    BalasPadam
  15. Maka diharapkan polisi ini boleh dirombak kembali supaya Malaysia tetap sama rata. Tidak ada yang berlaku sekarang ini. Kerajaan fikirkan semula..

    BalasPadam
  16. biarlah harga di seluruh negara diselaraskan.

    BalasPadam
  17. Polisi ini sememangnya mengakibatkan kita semakin miskin dan papa kedana.

    BalasPadam
  18. polisi ini harus digubal atau dihapuskan..

    BalasPadam
  19. nampaknya polisi ini tidak memberikan kebaikan kepada pengguna serta pelabur selama ianya dilaksanakan..ia juga merugikan bagi sabah dan sarawak.

    BalasPadam
  20. kerajaan harus memikirkan kesan jika polisi ini terus dikuatkuasakan..ianya membebankan pengguna kerana harga barangan yang melambung tinggi di sabah dan sarawak berbanding semenanjung..adakah sabah dan sarawak tidak dianggap sebahagian dari malaysia dan hanya sebagai 'emergency tools'?

    BalasPadam
  21. jika polisi ini terus dikuatkuasakan bagaimana hendak meningkatkan taraf hidup rakyat khasnya di sabah dan sarawak? pendapatan tidak banyak tapi harga barangan terlalu mahal berbanding semenanjung..

    BalasPadam
  22. janji yang dibuat oleh kerajaan harus ditunaikan..najib sendiri sudah cakap bahawa kerajaan tidak memberikan janji yang tidak dapat direalisasikan..oleh itu, buktikanlah bahawa kerajaan adalah pihak yang berpegang kepada janji..

    BalasPadam
  23. Polisi cabotage ini membebankan lagi rakyat Sabah yang miskin.

    BalasPadam
  24. The cabotage policy definitely needs to be reviewed. This policy has been a burden to the local consumers and businessmen.

    BalasPadam
  25. Mereka mahu sangat selaraskan itu ini, jadi buanglah polisi kabotaj ini, habis cerita.

    BalasPadam
  26. To our dear local politicians, please fight with your heart endlessly and be not worry, the Sabahans will always support you. This is for your own grandsons and daughters good too.

    BalasPadam
  27. Polisi ini sememangnya menyusahkan rakyat Sabah. Ia patut dibuang.

    BalasPadam
  28. Harap cabotage policy ini boleh dihapuskan kerana ia membebankan rakyat Sabah.

    BalasPadam