Jumaat, Disember 10, 2010

EPU FORMULA TO REDUCE SABAH POVERTY ALL WRONG ?

Sabah poverty: 'EPU formula all wrong'

KOTA KINABALU: Sabah continues to top the list of poor states in the country because the federal government's allocation for each state is based on the number of Malaysian citizens in each state and not the actual population.

Former Malaysian Human Rights Commission (Suhakam) vice-chairman, Simon Sipaun said the Malaysia Plan formula which was used by the Economic Planning Unit (EPU) was not feasible for Sabah because it did not take into account the thousands of illegal immigrants.

He said nine years ago when Suhakam was under the chairmanship of Musa Hitam, they had a dialogue in Kuala Lumpur which involved the relevant ministers and the EPU.

“During the meeting, I asked (the EPU) how they allocated money to all the states when formulating the Malaysia Plan.

"In the case of Sabah, I said, there are many illegal immigrants in Sabah and supposing that we have half a million illegal immigrants in Sabah, do you take into account the total number of people in Sabah when you allocate the money or not,” he recalled.

Sipaun said the answer given to him was that the EPU only took into account the actual number of Malaysians who are in Sabah.

“I told them this was not fair because if there are only one million registered Malaysian citizens in Sabah, but the overall number of people in Sabah included 500,000 illegal immigrants then when we (in Sabah) get the RM1 million allocation we have to share it among 1.5 million people.

“I also explained to them why it is not fair because the illegal immigrants still have to go to the hospitals, schools maybe, they use the roads and everything and so we (Sabahans) are actually short-changed.

"The EPU's response was that they didn't know the figure. I told them that it is their job to know the actual number of people (in Sabah) because if not who else would know about it.

“When I came back to Sabah later, I wrote to the (then) Sabah state secretary (KY Mustafa) to tell him that I was very surprised with what I heard (during the meeting) and I asked if he can find out what the actual situation was.

“I got a response from KY Mustafa. He said he had referred it to the state cabinet and that was all that I heard about it,” he said.

Unfair to penalise voters

37 ulasan:

  1. Siapa suruh PATI itu datang ke Sabah? Mengapa duit cukai yang dikeluarkan oleh rakyat perlu digunakan untuk menanggung kehidupan PATI ini sedangkan mereka tidak bekerja dan tidak membayar cukai. Kalau mereka mahu pendidikan dan perubatan, suruh mereka balik ke tempat asal mereka.

    Bagaimana mereka boleh tahu bilangan sebenar PATI yang ada di Sabah? Mereka ini menyeludup masuk negeri kita dari pintu belakang. Tiada dokumen pengenalan, tiada rekod kemasukan, bagaimana mengetahui bilangan mereka?

    BalasPadam
  2. Duit cukai itu sepatutnya digunakan untuk membantu rakyat Sabah. Kita bukan rumah amal untuk membantu semua PATI yang datang. Bagaimana kita boleh bantu? Rakyat sendiri pun tidak mampu kita tolong.

    BalasPadam
  3. kesenangan yang Malaysia berikan menjadikan PATI juga menikmatinya dan rakyat Sabah sudah muak berkongsi segala-galanya dengan mereka. cuma EPU perlulah mendapatkan jumlah sebenar penduduk Sabah dan mereka kenalah pandai kenalpasti siapa PATI dan siapa M'sian. kalau itu pun tak tahu...bagus jangan kerja..

    BalasPadam
  4. kadang tu, PATI susah dikenal kerana mereka sudah lama tinggal disini dan lengok bahasa juga adalah seperti Sabahan. Ada yang sudah beranak pinak disini cuma tidak diketahui mereka tu PATI. EPU harus bekerja keras dalam mengenalpasti jumlah sebenar penduduk Sabah

    BalasPadam
  5. peruntukan EPU berikan tu haruslah menepati jumlah PATI dan penduduk..

    BalasPadam
  6. PATI ni betul2 menyusahkan, byk wang teleh dihabiskan untuk mengurus dorang ni sahaja hingga menyebabkan pembangunan negeri Sabah terbantut.

    BalasPadam
  7. Lebih banyak peruntukan perlu diberikan kepada Sabah..ini kerana penduduk Sabah x hanya terkumpul di satu tempat saja, tetapi berselerak sehingga ke kawasan pendalaman...utk memastikan peruntukan utk penduduk2 di kawasan pendalaman ini sampai, jg memerlukan belanja yg byk....

    BalasPadam
  8. PATI memang telah banyak memberi masalah kepada Sabah.

    BalasPadam
  9. peruntukan yang diberikan haruslah menepati keperluan Sabah dan ia juga perlu digunakan dengan sebaiknya untuk manfaat rakyat.

    BalasPadam
  10. Memang PATI ini memberikan masalah kepada Sabah. Kalau PATI itu tidak diberikan makan pula nanti dicakap Sabah ini mendera warga asing. Kerajaan negeri perlu mencari perkara yang boleh mengurangkan kedatang pendatang haram ini keSabah.

    BalasPadam
  11. Kerajaan Sabah perlu pandai mengunakan peruntukkan yang telah disediakan.

    BalasPadam
  12. bagaimana agaknya respon beliau sekiranya kerajaan memperuntukkan dana dengan mengambil kira bilangan PATI. sudah tentu kenyataan beliau hari ini berubah kononnya kerajaan mahu menanggung PATI2 yang terdapat di Sabah.

    BalasPadam
  13. sepatutnya kerajaan serius menangani masalah kebanjiran PATI di negeri ini terlebih dahulu supaya kerja2 pelaksanaan pembangunan sosial, infranstruktur serta ekonomi mudah dilaksanakan.

    BalasPadam
  14. then EPU should fix it..

    BalasPadam
  15. if federal govt cannot solve the PATI issue, then give the autonomy and allocation to state govt..sabahan knows better than orang semenanjung..

    BalasPadam
  16. PATI and also IMM13 holder is the mother of problems in sabah..solve it!

    BalasPadam
  17. i wonder what najib thinks about this issue?

    BalasPadam
  18. Ya sokong gambir... Kalau itu pun dorang taktau kasi beza, na bagus bagi tu kerja ma aku.. Pandai lagi aku buat kali. hahahhaa

    BalasPadam
  19. Kan best kalau takda Pati, konpom isu2 sebegini tak keluar. huhuu

    BalasPadam
  20. Isu pati ni betul2 bikin panas... Entah bila lah mahu selesai... Cuba la masuk sabah ikut prosuder kan bagus, tak juga kena caci maki... Tapi kalau masuk pintu belakang pas tu buat hal lagi di tempat org (trep negeri sendiri), konpom la perlu di hantar balik ke tempat asal...

    BalasPadam
  21. Pas tu bila mo hantar balik pun satu hal, terpaksa juga guna duit... Duit dorang sendiri tak pa juga, tp ni duit rakyat.. aduiii..

    BalasPadam
  22. Saya harap perkara ni dapat ditanggani dgn baik. Pastikan peruntukan yang disediakan digunakan sepenuhnya utk pembangunan negeri Sabah dan rakyat Sabah!

    BalasPadam
  23. Taking care of the interest of PATI's now? So that it could encourage more PATI to come to Sabah? We want them gone, not invite more to come.

    BalasPadam
  24. I support 100%. None of them really care about the illegals issue in Sabah.

    BalasPadam
  25. Sebab mereka tidak betul2 mengetahui latar belakang Sabah yang penuh dengan pendatang.

    BalasPadam
  26. Well, the government should do something about this.

    BalasPadam
  27. Bagi pendapat saya, hal ini harus dipandang serius.

    BalasPadam
  28. All wrong? Who's fault is that?

    BalasPadam
  29. Semua pasal PATI. Kalau tiada PATI semua beres.

    BalasPadam
  30. Sabah will be a better place without the existence of PATI.

    BalasPadam
  31. Government should really take this PATI issue seriously. It may not be easy to solve this issue but I trust the government will try their hardest best to solve it.

    BalasPadam
  32. Who has brought in the illegals ?
    Why are they in this country esp in Sabah ?
    Sure they need to go to school , hospitals ,etc
    The employers should not simply engage the illegals.Legalised them so that they could bc counted in the budget/allocation.

    BalasPadam
  33. Harap isu ini boleh diselesaikan sebaik mungkin.

    BalasPadam
  34. Carilah langkah yang betul untuk membasmi kemiskinan di Sabah.

    BalasPadam
  35. The Sabahans have been facing this sort of issue for a long time. Hopefully the federal government will pay more attention on our problems.

    BalasPadam
  36. The federal should do more to change the situation...

    BalasPadam