Jumaat, Januari 20, 2012

ONE MAN'S MEAT IS ANOTHER MAN'S POISON

BN Cybertroopers, PR_Fags, A /k/ guide to identifying them

So lots of political threat lately, thanks to Clean. Anyways just like sport rivalries, political threads are pretty much a game of pointing fingers, in which supporters of each sides put emphasis on issues outside the game rather than the game itself (i.e. they're more likely to find faults in opposition rather than merits in themselves). It's hard to be impartial in this situation, especially when each decision relies on your everyday well being. However it is important to note which side each person is on, so that you can roughly estimate the bias-ness of the content of their argument. So here's a guide to help you in /k/

PR_Fag

  • Loves to link news especially those of from internet media like MalaysiaKini, FreeMalaysiaToday, or Malaysia Today. Sometimes content from Mainstream Media (MSM) like Utusan or TheStar is posted especially when they can link those article against BN. Never posts news from MSM like "kids gets RM100million funding from BN state" as those news are deemed as propaganda and just a gimmick to garner more votes.
  • On the other hand, positive news about PR_states is treated as a divine act as the ruling party clearly does those act out of the feeling of responsibility rather than just an attempt to woo voters.
  • Relies on anti-BN sentiment to attract people and cover their weakness. PR Corrupt? BN is worst. PR MPs given RM10k allowance? BN outdo them for over 100x more. Anwar Sex Scandal? Chua Soi Lek has a biger boner than him. Basically the only reason why you're on top is because the rest of the class are morons.
  • Every word uttered by PR politicians are words of wisdom while those by BN parties are pure lies
  • If you make a statement supporting PR, you've seen the light, if against, BN probably bought you with a RM10million Villa in Damansara Heights.
  • 99% of political threads in /k/ is started by them. Including this one.

BN Cybertroopers

  • BN Cybertroopers has evolved from the early days of /k/ till now. In those days, one could easily identify Cybertroopers by their "PR Sucks, BN Rules" approach. However, as they say failure is a stepping stone to success, they have become more intelligent and take a more convincing approach. However evolution takes time and they still have some remnants of their old self in them today.
  • Never link any news from any sites. Often make claims (DAP actually means Decepticons for Anwar as Prime Minister) without any link other than crudely photoshopped pictures.
  • Insist that we should never bite the hands that feed us since everything we have today is bestowed by the Government. (a common tactic against students)
  • Appear to post a neutral opinion at the beginning of a thread, insisting on a neutral stance. However a few post later and you'll realize these people won't stop posting untill you say "I'm convinced now that PR sucks and BN is the way to go".
  • Attempt to divert anti BN threads with baseless posting like "Adakah aku kisah" or "this thread should be closed. It's useless" in hope that the thread becomes dead.
  • When everything else fails, bring religion in.
  • Rely on historical performance to bring confidence to the people (Who liberated Malaysia from the British? BN has experience in ruling the country, what about PR)

13 ulasan:

  1. PR ataupun BN masing-masing ada penyokong sendiri, tapi saya pernah nampak ada yang sudah melampau dengan menggunakan bahasa yang tidak elok ataupun menabur fitnah tanpa asas.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. para komentar harus mampunyai etika ketika mengomen.

      Padam
  2. Sebenarnya BN dan PR ada kelemahan dan kebaikan sendiri. Pembaca sendiri perlu pandai membezakan, jangan sekadar main puji ataupun kritik sahaja.

    BalasPadam
  3. masing2 ada penyokong sendiri dan mereka pasti akan memihak pada parti mereka. dalam dunia siber, bebas untuk keluarkan pendapat mereka.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. apapun, kebebasan ada batasnya. jadilah pengguna siber yang beretika.

      Padam
  4. Each has their own opinion as well as stance on which fractions they choose to align themselves to. But at least have the decency to "agree to disagree".

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Agreed. By having decency "to agree to disagree", at least it shows the person has professionalism in expressing his opinion instead throwing tantrum, saying harsh words when commenting.

      Padam
  5. Constructive criticism is well warranted on each side. At least the argument can be mind stimulating rather than a mindless rantings with zero substance.

    BalasPadam
  6. biar rakyat sendiri yang menilai.

    BalasPadam
  7. Inilah dunia moden dengan teknologi yang tanpa batasan. Senang dan mudah untuk disampaikan dan diterima.

    BalasPadam
  8. Mana yang bagi lebih akan mendapat sokongan dari rakyat.

    BalasPadam
  9. Matlamat menghalalkan cara.

    BalasPadam
  10. the main purpose of each article published is to attract readers and then submit their ideas..

    BalasPadam