Isnin, April 16, 2012

“NO BUSINESS ASSOCIATION WHATSOEVER WITH AN INDIVIDUAL NAMED MICHAEL CHIA” ?

“No Business Association Whatsoever With An Individual Named Michael Chia” ? – We Release Further Documents!

Posted Friday, April 13th, 2012

image

No business association with Chia? Then Musa Aman has a lot to explain, including the standing orders on Chia's various accounts to Musa's sons.

Musa Aman, Sabah’s Chief Minister, has come out to publicly deny that he had any business relationship with the timber trade ‘fixer’ Michael Chia, thereby implying that the hundreds of documents that have been released into our possession, along with the testimony of industry insiders, are false.

I wish to put it on record once again that I have no business association whatsoever with an individual named Michael Chia”[Musa Aman statement 12/11/12]

However, numerous bank statements in our possession (see example right) show the exact opposite.  They indicate that Michael Chia (Chia Tien Foh) was at the centre of a web of transactions linking Sabah timber concessions to payments made to family members and key associates of Musa Aman.

One of these associates, the Sabah solicitor Richard Christopher Barnes, was arrested and held in custody, along with Michael Chia, at the time of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission’s (MACC) investigation into Sabah timber corruption back in 2010.  Huge volumes of documents were confiscated from Barnes’ offices by investigators, who prepared a major prosecution case.

image

'Nothing to do with me' - Musa's lawyer, Richard Christopher Barnes and Michael Chia together a a party attended by Musa Aman

Barnes and Chia are understood to have given full statements, admitting their involvement in kickbacks for concessions in the state and the MACC have told sources they drew up a dossier containing 40 charges against Musa, which was then blocked by his relative and close ally the Attorney General, Abdul Gani Patail.

Because of this failure to prosecute and the suppression of this evidence, we are continuing to review and release the documents now in our possession.

These documents strongly corroborate the allegations under investigation, that Michael Chia was acting as a collecting agent for timber kickbacks to the Chief Minister.

Michael Chia was in the timber business and regarded as the ‘collecting agent’ for Musa

Far from being forged, our documentation is extensive and wide-ranging and it is backed up by testimony received from Sabah timber industry insiders. The evidence also corroborates publicly known facts published in court cases involving Michael Chia, who was arrested in Hong Kong in 2008, while attempting to smuggle SG16million back to Malaysia.

One case in the Sabah High Court has already clearly demonstrated that Chia was acting as a “middle-man” between Yayasan Sabah and timber tycoons seeking concessions.  Documents produced in evidence during Chia’s prosecution for allegedly cheating a timber concession holder, Agus Hassan, include a letter by Hassan explaining he had been told to pay a kickback to UMNO Sabah via Chia.

The letter says that Yayasan representative Mohd Tampokong was refusing to issue permission for the logging to begin until Chia was satisfied.  Agus Hassan was later angered to discover that Chia took at least some of the profit himself.

image

Evidence in court - a letter from timber concession holder Agus Hassan to Yayasan Sabah complaining that Chia, acting in a "middle-man' role, was holding up the commencement of logging until kickbacks were paid through him. Why was Yayasan's Mohd Daud Tampokong allowing Chia to act as a "middle-man" between Yayasan officials and timber merchants? As Chairman, Musa Aman should explain.

But, why would Hassan, a man granted a concession by Musa Aman, think there was a kickback involved in gaining the concession and that Chia was the agent for Musa/Sabah UMNO?  Why was Yayasan’s Mohd Tampkong following Chia’s instructions?  And why did Hassan not just report the extortion to the Head of the Board of Yayasan Trustees, Aman himself?

These are questions that Musa Aman has yet to satisfactorily answer. However, our new evidence goes a long way towards doing just that.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-10.33.07-600x94 

From the MACC's document listing Yayasan's secret timber concessions - Agus Hassan's timber concession became the subject of a criminal prosecution against Chia

  1. There is plenty of evidence to show that Michael Chia was not only a “middle-man” between Yayasan and timber concession-seekers, but also acquired numerous Yayasan timber concessions of his own.  He has publicly acknowledged it in another on-going case in the High Court of Singapore:

“I am in the business of exporting timber logs from Malaysia internationally through my group of companies, including Rimba Kita and Rasanmewa”[Chia Tien Foh, Affidavit, High Court of Singapore 19/12/2011]

The MACC has listed numerous further concessions associated with Michael Chia as a result of its investigations (below), so why has the Chief Minister denied any dealings with Chia whatsoever?  As Chairman of the Board of Trustees at Yayasan Sabah, he exerts ultimate approval over all timber licences, including those given to Chia.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-10.47.31-600x440 

Chia-related logging companies, as listed in the leaked MACC document. Sarawak Report has further details of the logging concessions handed out to these companies, which are not included in the MACC report

These timber concession could only have been authorised by the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Yayasan Sabah, Musa Aman. They were awarded to a feckless young man, who had no experience in the timber trade and no family money before he set about presenting himself as the back channel to Musa Aman after 2003.

image

Same party, socialising with Musa - Chia became known for his extravagant life-style, exhibited by his string of expensive high-performance cars

So, far from denying that he has had no association whatsoever with Mr Chia, could Musa Aman explain in detail how and why this boy was in receipt of so many state timber concessions, granted by the Board of Yayasan Trustees of which he was the Chairman?

Chia, who was notorious for his ‘flash’ tastes, was soon exhibiting ridiculous wealth.  His string of high-performance cars included a Hummer H2, no less than three Lamborghinis, a Ferrari 430, a number of BMWs, Mercedes Benz and Toyotas.

Genuine businessmen can testify that it takes time to build such wealth from scratch. Investment and repayment of borrowed moneys have to come first.  And yet Chia enjoyed virtually instant disposable income in vast quantities almost from the moment that Musa Aman started to endow him with extensive timber concessions.

The Chief Minister has yet to explain why he chose to endow the young and inexperienced Michael Chia with these concessions.  He needs to do so, if his denials are to become convincing.

Millions In Michael Chia’s bank accounts were paid in by timber tycoons

All the evidence in fact points to one credible explanation, which was that money was pouring into Chia’s bank accounts from kickbacks.  This evidence matches the testimony of numerous sources in the Sabah timber business.

To begin with we can demonstrate from bank statements in our possession that luxury goods for Chia were being paid for out of accounts that were also receiving payments from timber tycoons.  We can also prove that these tycoons were linked to Chia’s own concessions in Sabah and to other concessions which were separately granted after 2003.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-11.27.34-600x489 

One of the accounts controlled by Chia. He closed it after his arrest in 2008 by the Hong Kong authorities - the US$220k was spent on a Lamborghini, according to sources, and US$500K was sent to Chia's BVI account with CTF International Ltd, from which he then sent payments to Musa, according to the investigators and inside sources

As we will go on to demonstrate, this very same Hong Kong UBS account controlled by Chia also received several major payments in 2006/2007 from a number of timber companies and made some interesting other out-payments.

The payers-in included the company Borion Enterprise Ltd, connected to a known Sarawak timber tycoon, and the out-payments included an enormous US$4million transfer to a ‘Richard Christopher’.

Chia can also be seen to have made a number of personal in-payments and withdrawals worth thousands of US dollars.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-11.37.33-600x592 

In-payments by Borion Enterprise and out-payments to Chia and to 'Richard Christopher'

Our sources have confirmed that Richard Christopher refers to Richard Christopher Barnes, the solicitor arrested during the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigation into timber corruption in Sabah and identified as the lawyer handling financial matters for Musa Aman (see picture above with friend Chia).

Questions for Musa

image

So much that fails to add up after Musa Aman's denial that he has had any relations with Michal Chia

These statements represent just a fraction of the evidence we have in our possession, consisting of numerous similar transactions through Chia controlled bank accounts, involving a number of timber companies with concessions in Sabah.

The Chief Minister has yet to provide any answer to the information we published in an earlier report, which is that one of these, a closely related account Hong Kong UBS account, was making regular payments to Musa Aman’s sons in Australia.

Standing instruction to pay Musa’s son

We can now provide further documents showing yet more payments from Chia accounts to Musa’s family.

Back in 2005 an account in Chia’s own name, managed by HSBC Hong Kong, registered a regular monthly standing order payment for Musa’s son, Mohammed Hayssam Musa, who was studying in Perth.

At the same time we can see that this same account was also receiving huge payments, amounting to millions of US dollars from the company Borion Enterprise Ltd.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-14.52.57-600x384 

No business relationship? This Chia account held a standing instruction to pay Musa's own son in Australia. It was also receiving hundreds of thousand of USD from Borion Enterprise. Balance US$1.7 million !

Both the Musa boys were, as we have already shown, accessing the same account to cover their expenses during education in Australia. If this was not a business relationship then Musa Aman needs to be clear about what kind of relationship he did have with Michael Chia.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-17.23.48-600x419 

"I did not have sex with that woman" - Musa Aman's denials are starting to ring as hollow as President Clinton's!

More detail on Borion Enterprise Ltd – the Taib connection!

So what is the significance of the Hong Kong company, Borion Enterprise Ltd, which has been making such regular and enormous payments to Michael Chia?

Borion Enterprise Ltd, is part-owned by a Sarawak timber magnate Ngui Ing Chuan, a major shareholder of the Taib-linked company Ta Ann. Ngui also owns Borion Enterprise Sdn Bhd and Borion Shipping Sdn Bhd, both Malaysian companies based in Sarawak.

However, the major shareholder in the Hong Kong arm of the Borion Group is not Ngui, but another company called Silvermark Consultants Ltd.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-17.38.15-600x403 

Who owns Silvermark Consultants? Timber tycoon Ting Pek King's son Peter Ting!

In turn Silvermark Consultants Ltd is owned by the son of Sarawak’s Timber Tycoon and Taib crony, Ting Pek King!  ”Borion came into Sabah flashing big money from the start”, one source related.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-17.43.15-600x432 

Peter Ting (Ting Sie Huong) - the eldest son of Ting Pek King has been paying huge sums into Michael Chia's bank accounts. Why?

This begs the crucial question as to why the Ting Pek King family were paying large sums of money into Michael Chia’s bank accounts?  Accounts that were being simultaneously used to fund Musa Aman’s boys in Australia.

Since Aman has come out to deny any associations with Chia or indeed any allegations of graft, can he please provide the fullest of explanations for this state of affairs?

Timber concessions related to Borion

Another major Sabah player linked to Ting Pek King is his cousin and known right hand man Simon Ling.  Simon Ling has been deeply involved in Sabah timber concessions since the arrival of Musa Aman into office and he is also closely connected in business to Michael Chia.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-17.51.44-600x207 

Simon Ling (Ling Ding Dieng) - The MACC's list of his Sabah concessions. These include a controversial steep area in Kuamut Forest where maps were re-drawn by the Forest Department in 2009 to make them appear less steep, so that they could be logged. The area is currently being razed, despite strictures against clear felling.

According to insiders Ling has also taken over the running and management of many of the concessions supposedly awarded to the young and inexperienced Michael Chia.

This corroborates with official company information available for all to see.  The company Top Merchant Sdn Bhd is the company that received the concessions to log Kuamat Forest.  The main shareholder of that company is Chia’s mistress Yap Siaw Lin.  However, the Director of Top Merchant Sd Bhd is none other than Simon Ling!

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-18.11.46-600x461 

Top Merchant - owned by Chia's Girlfriend, Yap Siaw Lin, but managed by Simon Ling

Insiders have confirmed that the payments from the Ting Pek King connected company Borion Enterprise Ltd into Chia’s accounts are indeed related to the timber concessions granted to Simon Ling by Yayasan Sabah and to Simon Ling’s management of Chia companies, of which he is the effective concession-holder.

image

Yap Siaw Lin - Chia's mistress and nominee for his company shares in Top Merchant Sdn Bhd

Chia has corroborated Borion’s involvement in his businesses by acknowledging in court that the company has exclusive rights of purchase from timber logged by Rimba Kita and Rasanmewa, companies he claims to own.

Chia has come up with his own excuses for his relationship with Borion and the payments, which he describes as a ‘Trade Advance’ by a trusted business associate.  However, such excuses do not explain the payments made to the Musa family or the millions sent on to Richard Christopher Barnes.

Insiders maintain that Chia’s web of bank accounts were merely a mechanism for processing kickbacks are further substantiated by numerous other transactions we have evidence of through the same accounts.

These involve companies linked to other timber tycoons also with concessions granted in Sabah, which we will also be revealing.

Angel Face Consultants

Meanwhile, we can now further reveal that informants have told the MACC that a BVI company Angel Face Consultants is owned by none other than Chief Minister Musa Aman and that it has received kickbacks through its Citibank Singapore account run by a close associate.

We will provide evidence that MACC and Hong Kong Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC)  investigators took these allegations seriously as we unravel further evidence.  It raises further questions about another series of enormous out-payments from Michael Chia’s HSBC account.

Screen-Shot-2012-04-12-at-23.18.41-600x352 

Two payments of US$4.5million and US$4million to Angel Face Consultancy Ltd cleared out Chia's account in September 2005

In September 2005 the account’s hefty balance of US$8.5 million was cleared by two major withdrawals in one day in favour of Angel Face Consultancy.  That is a lot of consultation in just one day!

Denials

Musa Aman has denied any business connection with Michael Chia, even though Chia was a prolific operator on the Sabah timber scene after 2004.

If he wished the Chief Minister could take immediate action to protect himself against all such allegations of graft and kickbacks.  He could reform the system that gives him total personal and private control over the allocation of timber concessions in the State.

This is because the Sabah Chief Minister is also Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Yayasan Sabah, which authorises timber licences over a million hectares of state forest land. Why?

Yayasan’s negotiations are held in private and the decisions it makes are unpublished and kept confidential.  Why?

No arrangement could be better designed to allow a total abuse of power by the man, who controls both the Government and the country’s richest natural resource.  So, why doesn’t Musa Aman reform it?

61 ulasan:

  1. Before Musa Aman took over the CM post from Chong Kah Kiat, the Yayasan Reserves is almost dried up, however within the first 8 years as the Sabah CM, Musa Aman was able to bring up the Yayasan Reserves to close to RM3 billion. This is an accomplishment compared to previous CM's who have only squandered the Yayasan Reserves without thought. If Musa is like them, the Yayasan Sabah will be bankrupt on the first year he entered as CM.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Memang betul, ini adalah salah satu pencapaian Musa Aman sebagai CM Sabah. Tidak dinafikan beliau mambawa pelbagai manfaat kepada Sabah.

      Padam
  2. If he wished the Chief Minister could take immediate action to protect himself against all such allegations of graft and kickbacks. He could reform the system that gives him total personal and private control over the allocation of timber concessions in the State. So, why doesn’t Musa Aman reform it?

    The report said Musa can reform the system to protect himself, but he didn't. Why? Maybe Musa does not have anything to hide, therefore he did not need to manipulate the system for his own benefits.

    BalasPadam
  3. Datuk Musa Aman enemies tricked to fell down him.

    BalasPadam
  4. musa memang tiada kaitan pun dengan si chia...kalau terbukti beliau ada kaitan, sudah lama beliau didakwa..tapi bukti yang ada tidak cukup untuk mengaitkan musa dengan chia..

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Ini hanya cerita untuk menjatuhkan Datuk Musa sahaja.

      Padam
    2. dulu lagi sudah dijelaskan bahawa Musa dan chia tiada kaitan, namun ada saja pihak yang sengaja mensensasikan isu ini.

      Padam
    3. Dakwaan recycle yang hanya digunakan oleh pihak terdesak sebagai alat politik mereka bagi mengalih sokongan rakyat.

      Padam
    4. Salah atau tidak, biarlah SPRm untuk menentukan dan membawa kes ini ke mahkamah.

      Padam
    5. Tuduhan tiada bukti seolah fitnah juga.

      Padam
  5. sarawak report mungkin mereka-reka cerita ini kerana sehingga kini tiada pengesahan daripada MACC mahupun ICAC mengenai dakwaan sarawak report yang mendapat maklumat bocor dari agensi2 tersebut.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Sarawak report pro-pembangkang dan tidak hairan ia digunakan oleh pihak pembangkang untuk melaksanakan agenda mereka.

      Padam
    2. Maklumat P&C ini harus disiasat terlebih dahulu. Banyak andaian yang negatif telah dibuat terhadap Musa dan keluarganya.

      Padam
  6. dokumen2 tersebut boleh dicipta dengan kemajuan teknologi yang ada sekarang...persoalan yang timbul ialah sejauh mana ketulenan dokumen2 tersebut yang dimiliki oleh sarawak report..kalau memang benar, mengapa tidak sarawak report buat pendedahan secara terbuka sahaja?

    BalasPadam
  7. sabah kini semakin pesat membangun dan kedudukan ekonomi juga semakin kukuh sejak musa mengambil alih tampuk pemerintahan kerajaan negeri dan sistem penggiliran KM sabah dihapuskan.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. sekarang ini ekonmi Sabah berkembang dengan baik, ditambah lagi dengan perlaksaan pelbagai projek seperti SAMUR dan SOGT.

      Padam
    2. ..Malah tadbir urus kewangan Sabah yang mana antara terbaik telah diberi pengiktirafan AAA.

      Padam
    3. Jika Ketua Menteri Musa Aman terlibat dalam rasuah, Sabah akan muflis sekarang. Tetapi sebaliknya, beliau telah memberikan keuntungan kepada Sabah lebih 1 bilion setiap tahun sejak beliau mengambil alih tampuk kerajaan negeri.

      Padam
  8. rakyat janganlah mudah percaya dengan apa yang didakwa oleh sarawak report kerana apa yang dikatakan oleh mereka tidak disokong dengan bukti2 yang kukuh..semua ini hanyalah mainan politik pihak tertentu yang terdesak disebabkan pilihanraya yang semakin hampir.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. rakyat perlu bijak menilai dan jangan mudah percaya dengan isu yang dimainkan oleh pihak tidak bertanggungjawab seperti ini.

      Padam
    2. Selagi belum dibuktikan oleh MACC, perkara ini hanya satu khabar angin sahaja.

      Padam
  9. isuini sengaja dimainkan oleh sesetengah pihak yang sengaja ingin menjejaskan imej Musa, namun semua tuduhan mereka adalah tidak berasas.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Isu ni cuma ditimbulkan bila dekat2 PRU. jelas sangat permainan politik pembangkang.

      Padam
    2. Kenalah tahu kebenaran sebelum percayakan berita yang palsu itu

      Padam
  10. jika dilihat pembangunan di Sabah semakin pesat..harap Sabah akan terus membangun dan maju.

    BalasPadam
  11. Bawa kes ini ke mahkamah dan biarkah mahkamah untuk menentukannya.

    BalasPadam
  12. Tuduhan bersama dengan bukti, susah untuk rakyat tidak mempercayainya.

    BalasPadam
  13. Only Musa & Chia kow their relationship.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. No one can figure out what actually happens.

      Padam
  14. The leaking info should investigate first.

    BalasPadam
  15. Ada juga pihak memainkan isu sensitif ini untuk menjatuhkan dan melemahkan kuasa Musa.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Tidak perlu mengambil terlampau banyak perhatian jika ini merupakan fitnah.

      Padam
  16. Tidak mungkin Sarawak mereka laporan MACC, harus juga mengenal pasti laporan tersebut sebelum membuat andaian yang bukan-bukan.

    BalasPadam
  17. Musa already deny that, but how many among us that really believe such?

    BalasPadam
  18. Jika ada bukti yang sah, rasa-rasa Musa dan keluarganya telah didakwa.

    BalasPadam
  19. His enemies are taking him down..

    BalasPadam
  20. Hope all the accusations can be stopped! There is no reason why musa would lie about this.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Lie or not is all can be revealed after proper investigation.

      Padam
  21. Jahat ni musah Musa mahu menjatuhkan imejnya, janganlah kami terus percaya..

    BalasPadam
  22. Report MACC tidak mungkin boleh didapat dengan mudah. Jika benar juga, siasatan harus diteruskan.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Terserah kepada SPRm untuk mengambil langkah yang wajar.

      Padam
    2. hanya laporan dari SPRM sahaja yang boleh dipercayai, selain itu tidak boleh pakai terutama dari Sarawak report.

      Padam
  23. Tidak ada pihak boleh dikecualikan dari tindakan undang-undang jika disabit bersalah.

    BalasPadam
  24. Ini bukan kali pertama beliau didakwa. Sering juga Musa disabit dengan kes rasuah juga.

    BalasPadam
  25. Cuma siasatan terperinci yang dapat membuktikan beliau salah atau tidak.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. Musa Aman mengatakan bahawa beliau akan bekerjasama dengan pihak berkuasa jika mereka ingin menyiasatnya.

      Padam
  26. Menjelang PRU, semua yang tidak diketahui juga terbongkar.

    BalasPadam
  27. Baik juga laporan sebegini terbongkar untuk menjamin politik yang lebih bersih & amanah.

    BalasPadam
  28. Musa dan nafikan, ia mmg tak da kaitan dgn Chia.

    BalasPadam
  29. Faham-fahamlah sekarang usaha bagi menjatuhkan seseorang dengan cara yang tidak baik. Saya tidak pasti kenapa tapi bagi pendapat saya sendiri ini adalah mungkin hanya strategi pihak tertentu untuk menjatuhkan Datuk Musa Aman. Datuk Musa dikaitkan dengan RASUAH. Kerana kita tahu Datuk Musa adalah bersih dengan segala masalah peribadi. Sebab itu isu rasuah dikaitkan dengan Datuk. Kerana isu ini senang direka-reka oleh mereka yang pentingkan diri sendiri.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. jika Datuk Musa Aman rasuah dan terlibat dengan skandal balak di negeri ini, bagaimana kerajaan negeri Sabah mampu mengekalkan keluasan hutan sebanyak lebih 60% dari muka bumi Sabah?? jumlah itu lebih tinggi dari standard nasional yang mahukan minimum 50%..

      Padam
  30. Buat apa kita percaya dengan berita ini jika tidak ada bukti yang dibawa ke mahkamah. Sedangkan Media tidak ada mengadili seseorang itu. Ini kerana semua itu terletak ditangan mahkamah untuk membuat keputusan. Media hanya tahu memberikan berita sama ada yang buruk, yang tidak benar dan tanpa ada bukti yang benar. Itulah yang sebenarnya berlaku dengan media pembangkang sekarang yang hanya suka memberikan pelbagai isu negatif yang berkaitan dengan kerajaan.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. pendedahan yang di buat oleh Sarawak Report ternyata bersifat berat sebelah.. entah kenapa mereka tidak mendedahkan skandal pasir di selangor?? adakah kerana negeri itu ditadbir oleh parti yang membiayai Sarawak Report??

      Padam
  31. yang penting kalau benar itu rasuah buktikan dengan bukti kukuh. Tidak ada guna hanya cakap kosong semata-mata.

    Kita tunggu apa siasatan daripada SPRM mengenai perkara ini. Jika tidak ada bukti kukuh rasanya pihak mahkamah tidak akan menerima pendakwaan tersebut. Kerana ini cuma membuang masa. Tidak ada guna mendakwa seseorang itu jika tidak mempunyai bukti.

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. sudah tentu Sarawak Report tidak mempunyai bukti kukuh yang nyata selain bukti2 yang sekadar layak dimain2kan di dunia maya.. mereka tidak perlu risau melakukan penipuan kerana undang2 Malaysia tidak mampu melakukan apa2 terhadap mereka yang beroperasi di luar negara..

      Padam
  32. datuk musa yang berkebolehan dalam pengurusan dan pentadbiran membuat ada pihak yang cemburu dan cuba menjatuhkan beliau dari jawatan KM tesebut.

    Yang pasti itu adalah faktanya. Jadi tidak hairan dengan pelbagai isu yang dipermainkan oleh pihat tertentu yang mengaitkan Datuk Musa. Yang pasti Datuk Musa adalah pemimpin yang berjiwa rakyat dan prihatin. Mari kita terus bersama-sama menyokong usaha yang dibuat oleh beliau.

    http://bayausbh.blogspot.com/2012/03/komitmen-dan-usaha-berterusan-membela.html

    BalasPadam
    Balasan
    1. maklumlah, dijangkakan pilihanraya umum akan berlangsung tahun ini.. agaknya inilah strategi pembangkang untuk merampas kerajaan selain melakukan demonstrasi jalanan..

      Padam
  33. Hanya strategi pihak tertentu untuk menjatuhkan Datuk Musa Aman. Datuk Musa dikaitkan dengan RASUAH. Kerana kita tahu Datuk Musa adalah bersih dengan segala masalah peribadi. Sebab itu isu rasuah dikaitkan dengan Datuk. Kerana isu ini senang direka-reka oleh mereka yang pentingkan diri sendiri.

    BalasPadam
  34. macam2 dokumen didedahkan.. saya pun naik heran, macam mana sebuah laman web mampu memperolehi maklumat sulit dari MACC dan ICAC.. adakah pegawai2 ICAC dan MACC terlibat dengan rasuah yang memungkinkan mereka menjual dokumen2 ini kepada pihak luar??

    BalasPadam
  35. pendedahan ini dibuat oleh Sarawak Report yang sebelum ini pernah terkantoi menggunakan dokumen yang telah diubah suai untuk menjatuhkan Taib Mahmud.. bila mereka gagal menjatuhkan kerajaan Taib, kini mereka beralih pula kepada kerajaan Musa..

    BalasPadam
  36. entah apa agenda sebenar pemilik Sarawak Report yang berada dan beroperasi di luar negara.. sudah tentu mereka tidak melakukan penyebaran pembohongan ini secara percuma.. entah mana pihak yang membiayai mereka..

    BalasPadam